体外膜肺氧合联合主动脉内球囊反搏治疗难治性心源性休克的疗效观察
作者:
作者单位:

(郑州大学第二附属医院综合ICU,河南省郑州市 450002)

作者简介:

刘晓静,硕士,主治医师,研究方向为重症医学,E-mail为liuxiaojingzz@163.com。通信作者王生锋,学士,主治医师,研究方向为重症医学,E-mail为lxjabcd@126.com。

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(81500319)


Observation of extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation combined with intra-aortic balloon pump in the treatment of refractory cardiogenic shock
Author:
Affiliation:

Intensive Care Unit, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450002, China)

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • | |
    摘要:

    目的 观察体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)联合主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)治疗难治性心源性休克(RCS)的疗效及安全性。方法 96例RCS患者被分为3组:IABP组(n=34)、ECMO组(n=32)及联合(IABP+ECMO)组(n=30)。在常规抗休克用药基础上分别应用IABP、ECMO及IABP+ECMO支持治疗。比较3组患者治疗前、治疗后6 h、1天、2天、3天的心率、平均动脉压(MAP)、中心静脉压(CVP)、血氧饱和度(SO2)、动脉血乳酸、心肌钙蛋白I(cTnI)、脑利钠肽(BNP)、左心室舒张末内径(LVED)、左心室射血分数(LVEF)及血管活性药物(多巴酚丁胺、去甲肾上腺素)用量的变化、并发症及临床转归(撤机成功率及住院期间死亡率)。结果 治疗3天后,3组患者上述指标均有逐步改善,而联合组上述指标的改善较IABP组及ECMO组更显著(P<0.05或P<0.01);ECMO组的心率、MAP、CVP、SO2、动脉血乳酸、cTnI、LVEF及多巴酚丁胺、去甲肾上腺素用量等指标的改善优于IABP组(均P<0.01);IABP组BNP、LVED的改善优于ECMO组(P<0.05,P<0.01);联合组并发症发生率高于IABP组和ECMO组(χ2=15.875,P<0.001;χ2=4.504,P=0.034);ECMO组并发症发生率高于IABP组(χ2=3.957,P=0.047);联合组撤机成功率高于IABP组和ECMO组(χ2=16.063,P<0.001;χ2=5.792,P=0.016);3组患者住院期间死亡率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 IABP+ECMO联合治疗在改善RCS患者血液动力学方面优于IABP和ECMO,但联合治疗增加了并发症发生率,影响了临床预后的改善;降低并发症成为提高联合治疗疗效的关键。

    Abstract:

    Aim To study the efficacy and safety of extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) combined with intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) in the treatment of refractory cardiogenic shock (RCS). Methods 96 patients with RCS were divided into 3 groups:IABP group (n=34), ECMO group (n=32) and IABP+ECMO combination group (n=30). On the basis of conventional antishock drugs, IABP, ECMO and IABP+ECMO were used respectively to support the treatment. Changes of heart rate, mean arterial pressure (MAP), central venous pressure (CVP), oxygen saturation (SO2), arterial lactate, cardiac troponin I (cTnI), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVED), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and vasoactive drugs (dobutamine, norepinephrine) dosage, complications and clinical outcomes (weaning success rate and in-hospital mortality) were compared among three groups before treatment and 6 hours, 1 day, 2 days, 3 days after treatment. Results After 3 days of treatment, the above indexes were improved gradually in all the three groups, and the above indexes in the combination group were significantly better than those in the IABP group and the ECMO group (P<0.05 or P<0.01). The improvements of heart rate, MAP, CVP, SO2, arterial lactate, cTnI, LVEF, dobutamine and norepinephrine dosage in ECMO group were better than those in IABP group (all P<0.01). The improvements of BNP and LVED in IABP group were better than those in ECMO group (P<0.05, P<0.01). The incidence of complications in combination group was higher than that in IABP group and ECMO group (χ2=15.875, P<0.001; χ2=4.504, P=0.034); The incidence of complications in ECMO group was higher than that in IABP group (χ2=3.957, P=0.047). The weaning success rate in combination group was higher than that in IABP group and ECMO group (χ2=16.063, P<0.001; χ2=5.792, P=0.016). There was no significant difference in the in-hospital mortality among the three groups (P>0.05). Conclusion IABP+ECMO combined therapy is superior to IABP and ECMO in improving hemodynamics in patients with RCS, but combined therapy increases the incidence of complications, decreases the improvement of clinical prognosis; Reducing complications is the key to improve the efficacy of combined therapy.

    参考文献
    [1] Tewelde SZ, Liu SS, Winters ME.Cardiogenic shock.Cardiol Clin, 8,6(1):53-61.
    [2] Patel H, Nazeer H, Yager N, et al.Cardiogenic shock:Recent developments and significant knowledge gaps.Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med, 8,0(2):15.
    [3] 付海霞, 马继芳, 胡鸣凤, 等.体外膜肺氧合联合急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗抢救急性心肌梗死后心脏骤停患者的疗效及其影响因素.中华心血管病杂志, 7,5(10):867-873.
    [4] Werdan K, Gielen S, Ebelt H, et al.Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock.Eur Heart J, 4,5(3):156-167.
    [5] 朱瑞秋, 刘长智, 卢剑海, 等.体外膜肺氧合治疗难治性心源性休克的临床疗效及其影响因素.中华心血管病杂志, 6,4(9):777-781.
    [6] 于洁, 乔叶薷, 马金辉, 等.基于德尔菲法构建体外膜肺氧合辅助心肺复苏临床治疗专家共识.中国体外循环杂志, 6,4(4):193-196.
    [7] 吴华静, 张萍, 孙苏阳, 等.心血管重症病房急性心肌梗死心源性休克患者的临床预后分析.中国循证心血管医学杂志, 6,8(11):1357-1360.
    [8] 毛亚妮, 樊川民.主动脉球囊反搏联合参附注射液对急性心肌梗死合并泵衰竭行PCI治疗患者的疗效观察.中国循证心血管医学杂志, 6,8(7):850-852.
    [9] Den Uil CA, Galli G, Jewbali LS, et al.First-line support by intra-aortic balloon pump in non-ischaemic cardiogenic shock in the era of modern ventricular assist devices.Cardiology, 7,8(1):1-8.
    [10] Jiang X, Zhu Z, Ye M, et al.Clinical application of intra-aortic balloon pump in patients with cardiogenic shock during the perioperative period of cardiac surgery.Exp Ther Med, 7,3(5):1741-1748.
    [11] Thomaz PG, Júnior ML, Muramoto G, et al.Intra-aortic balloon pump in cardiogenic shock:state of the art.Rev Col Bras Cir, 7,4(1):102-106.
    [12] Ouweneel DM, Eriksen E, Sjauw KD, et al.Percutaneous mechanical circulatory support versus intra-aortic balloon pump in cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction.J Am Coll Cardiol, 7,9(3):278-287.
    [13] Zeymer U, Werdan K, Schuler G, et al.Editor's choice-impact of immediate multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention versus culprit lesion intervention on 1-year outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock:Results of the randomised IABP-SHOCK II trial.Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care, 7,6(7):601-609.
    [14] Espriella-Juan R, Valls-Serral A, Trejo-Velasco B, et al.Impact of intra-aortic balloon pump on short-term clinical outcomes in ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock:A “real life” single center experience.Med Intensiva, 7,1(2):86-93.
    [15] Sayed S, Schimmer C, Shade I, et al.Combined pulmonary and left ventricular support with veno-pulmonary ECMO and impella 5.0 for cardiogenic shock after coronary surgery.J Cardiothorac Surg, 7,2(1):38.
    [16] 龙村.体外膜肺氧合循环支持专家共识.中国体外循环杂志, 4,2(2):65-67.
    [17] 刘长智, 周柱江, 朱瑞秋, 等.心源性休克应用体外膜肺氧合期间并发左室膨胀的观察研究.中华急诊医学杂志, 7,6(1):113-115.
    [18] Khorsandi M, Dougherty S, Bouamra O, et al.Extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiogenic shock after adult cardiac surgery:a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Cardiothorac Surg, 7,2(1):55.
    [19] Wallinder A, Pellegrino V, Fraser JF, et al.ECMO as a bridge to non-transplant cardiac surgery.J Card Surg, 7,2(8):514-521.
    [20] Scandroglio AM, Pieri M, Pappalardo F, et al.Intra-aortic balloon pump during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation:still a matter of debate?--Contemporary multi-device approach to cardiogenic shock.J Thorac Dis, 7,9(5):E522-E524.
    [21] Bréchot N, Demondion P, Santi F, et al.Intra-aortic balloon pump protects against hydrostatic pulmonary oedema during peripheral venoarterial-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care, 8,7(1):62-69.
    [22] 谢海秀, 杨峰, 江春景, 等.成人心脏术后心源性休克接受体外膜肺氧合循环辅助脱机后临床转归分析.中华医学杂志, 7,7(12):929-933.
    [23] 焦瑞, 江春景, 侯晓彤, 等.体外膜肺氧合在主动脉手术后应用的院内死亡危险因素分析.中华胸心血管外科杂志, 7,3(6):351-354.
    [24] 乔叶薷, 黑飞龙.体外膜肺氧合支持的心肺复苏研究进展.中国急救医学, 7,7(9):851-854.
    引证文献
引用本文

刘晓静,王生锋,刘小军,祁绍艳,卢艳秋,郭燕,楚紫栋,王文涛.体外膜肺氧合联合主动脉内球囊反搏治疗难治性心源性休克的疗效观察[J].中国动脉硬化杂志,2018,26(8):784~791.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1383
  • 下载次数: 1005
历史
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-04
  • 最后修改日期:2018-04-08
  • 在线发布日期: 2018-07-17