高血压患者心电图SD波在诊断左心室肥厚中的价值
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

(1.苏州大学附属常州市第一人民医院心电图室,江苏省常州市 213003;2.苏州大学附属常州市第一人民医院心超室,江苏省常州市 213003;3.苏州大学附属常州市第一人民医院心内科,江苏省常州市 213003)

作者简介:

朱韵,本科,副主任医师,研究方向为结构性心脏病的心电图诊断,E-mail为loisice@sohu.com。通信作者徐敏,博士研究生,副主任医师,研究方向为心血管微创治疗,E-mail 为loisicelin@163.com。

通讯作者:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金面上项目(81871381);国家自然科学青年基金项目(81701734);常州市卫计委指导项目(WZ201804);常州市科技局应用基础研究(CJ20190086)


The value of the deepest S wave of electrocardiogram in the diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with hypertension
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Department of Electrocardiogram,Changzhou, Jiangsu 213003, China ;2.Department of Echocardiography,Changzhou, Jiangsu 213003, China ;3.Department of Cardiovascular Division, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, Jiangsu 213003, China)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的 测试一种新的心电图诊断标准,提高诊断原发性高血压病合并左心室肥厚的准确性。方法 以美国超声心动图学会对左心室质量测量作为标准,选取高血压病(HBP)合并左心室肥厚(LVH)患者129例,同期根据年龄、性别匹配高血压左心室正常组(109名)。同步记录12导联心电图,选取所有心电图导联中最深S波(SD)为研究对象,与采用目前公认的LVH心电图标准Cornell和Sokolow-Lyon进行比较,计算心电图相关指标判断HBP合并LVH的ROC曲线及其曲线下面积(AUC),获得鉴别的最佳临界值。结果 心电图SD预测HBP合并LVH的敏感度、特异度及AUC分别为86.05%、81.65%、0.892;心电图SD+Sv4显示最高的敏感度为88.37%。等效性检验显示单导联SD的AUC较Cornell、Sokolow-Lyon及SD+Sv4标准Z值均具有统计学差异(P<0.05)。心电图SD诊断男性HBP合并LVH的AUC及敏感度、特异度分别为0.901、90.29%、75.34%,等效性检验均优于Cornell、Sokolow-Lyon及SD+Sv4标准(P<0.05)。结论 心电图SD诊断HBP合并LVH,提高了其诊断的敏感性,优于Cornell和Sokolow-Lyon标准,值得临床推广。

    Abstract:

    Aim This study tested a new criteria for electrocardiogram to improve the accuracy of primary hypertension with left ventricular hypertrophy. Methods The study measured left ventricular mass according to the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) standard. We selected 129 patients with hypertension (HBP) and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) diagnosed in our hospital. At the same time, the normal wall thickness group of hypertension was matched according to age and gender. It simultaneously recorded 12-lead ECG, selected the deepest S-wave (SD) of all leads as the research object, and currently accepted LVH ECG criteria such as Cornell voltage and Sokolow-Lyon were used for comparison. Area under the curve (AUC) analysis was used for comparison of single and combined leads. Results The AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of SD predicted HBP with LVH were 0.2,6.05% and 81.65%, and SD+Sv4 showed the highest sensitivity of 88.37%. The equivalence test showed that Z value of SD was statistically different from that of Cornell,Sokolow-Lyon and SD+Sv4(all P<0.05). The AUC, sensitivity and specificity of predicted male HBP with LVH were 0.1,0.29% and 75.34%. The equivalence test was superior to Cornell, Sokolow-Lyon and SD+Sv4 (all P<0.05). Conclusion The new criteria SD to diagnose HBP with LVH improves the sensitivity of diagnosis, superior to Cornell and Sokolow-Lyon standards which is worthy of clinical promotion.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

朱韵,杨盼,葛志祥,王幸,刘飞,徐敏,杨玲.高血压患者心电图SD波在诊断左心室肥厚中的价值[J].中国动脉硬化杂志,2020,28(2):123~127.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-25
  • 最后修改日期:2019-10-12
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-01-20