急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者直接PCI术后口服替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷疗效比较
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

(1.天津医科大学心血管病临床学院,天津市 300070;2.泰达国际心血管病医院心内五科,天津市 300457)

作者简介:

杨媛,硕士研究生,住院医师,研究方向为冠心病的基础与临床,E-mail为yangyuan0120@126.com。

通讯作者:

基金项目:

天津市卫生和计划生育委员会项目(2015KZ010);天津市滨海新区卫生和计划生育委员会项目(2015BWKY014)


Efficacy comparison of oral administration of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after direct PCI
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Clinical College of Cardiovascular Disease, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China;2.The Fifth Department of Cardiology, Teda International Cardiovascular Hospital, Tianjin 300457, China)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的 评估替格瑞洛对接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入术(PCI)的急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者抗血小板治疗的临床疗效及安全性。方法 入选诊断STEMI并行直接PCI的164例患者,随机分为替格瑞洛组(40例)和氯吡格雷组(124例)。根据治疗后第5天血小板聚集率结果进而将氯吡格雷组分为非氯吡格雷抵抗(CPGR)组(81例)和CPGR组(43例),CPGR组患者改服替格瑞洛。随访3个月,分析替格瑞洛组和非CPGR组用药后5天、1个月、3个月血小板聚集率、主要不良心血管事件(MACE)(心源性死亡、非致死性心肌梗死、卒中、靶血管再次血运重建、支架内血栓形成、再发心绞痛、心功能不全)和药物不良反应(出血、呼吸困难)发生情况;分析CPGR组换药前后血小板聚集率变化。结果 替格瑞洛组治疗后第5天、1个月、3个月的血小板聚集率均明显低于非CPGR组(33.94%±14.90%比53.13%±14.07%,25.26%±8.89%比35.51%±9.45%,24.91%±7.55%比31.57%±9.53%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);CPGR组换用替格瑞洛1个月后血小板聚集率明显降低(28.33%±8.11%比64.50%±11.38%),差异有统计学意义(t=18.944,P<0.05)。随访3个月,替格瑞洛组MACE、轻中度呼吸困难发生率较非CPGR组明显降低,且差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者在轻微出血方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者均无严重出血及重度呼吸困难者。结论 替格瑞洛抗血小板作用明显优于氯吡格雷,且对于CPGR患者安全有效,不良反应较轻微,安全性好。

    Abstract:

    Aim To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of ticagrelor's antiplatelet therapy for patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing direct percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Methods A total of 164 patients diagnosed with STEMI who underwent direct PCI was randomly divided into two groups:ticagrelor group (40 cases) and clopidogrel group (124 cases). According to the results of platelet aggregation rate on the fifth day after treatment, clopidogrel group was divided into two subgroups:non-clopidogrel resistance (CPGR) group (81 cases) and CPGR group (43 cases). The patients in group CPGR were changed to oral administration of ticagrelor. The patients were followed up for 3 months. 5 days, 1 month, 3 months after medication, platelet aggregation rate, main adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (including cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, revascularization of target vessels, stent thrombosis, recurrent angina pectoris, cardiac insufficiency) and adverse drug reactions (including haemorrhage and dyspnea) were analyzed and compared between ticagrelor group and non-CPGR group. Change of platelet aggregation rate before and after the change of medicine was analyzed in CPGR group. Results Platelet aggregation rates in ticagrelor group were significantly lower than that in non-CPGR group at 5 days, 1 month and 3 months after treatment (33.94%±14.90% vs 53.13%±14.07%, 25.26%±8.89% vs 35.51%±9.45%, 24.91%±7.55% vs 31.57%±9.53%), and differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). In CPGR group, the platelet aggregation rate decreased significantly after 1 month's change to ticagrelor (28.33%±8.11% vs 64.50%±11.38%), and difference was statistically significant (t=18.944, P<0.05). Followed up for 3 months, the incidences of MACE and mild to moderate dyspnea in ticagrelor group were significantly lower than those in non-CPGR group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in mild bleeding between the two groups (P>0.05). There were no severe bleeding and severe dyspnea in the two groups. Conclusion The antiplatelet effect of ticagrelor is superior to clopidogrel, and it is safe and effective for CPGR patients with mild adverse reactions and good safety.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

杨媛,王伟,王晓冬,黄平,麻仕利,卢姿瑾.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者直接PCI术后口服替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷疗效比较[J].中国动脉硬化杂志,2018,26(6):611~616.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2017-11-03
  • 最后修改日期:2017-12-18
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2018-07-10