脑小血管病及其亚型与颈动脉粥样硬化的相关性
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:


The Relationship Between Small Vessel Disease and Carotid Atherosclerosis
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的通过对脑小血管病及其亚型与颈动脉粥样硬化危险因素的比较,阐明其相关性,探讨颈动脉粥样硬化的发生对脑小血管病的影响,为其早期防治提供依据。方法前瞻性登记腔隙性脑梗死、脑白质疏松和颈动脉粥样硬化患者的年龄、性别、血压、血糖、血脂、吸烟、饮酒、纤维蛋白原、腹围及体质指数等,采用多因素Logistic回归分析。结果①颈动脉粥样硬化的主要危险因素是年龄、高血压、糖尿病、高胆固醇血症、高低密度脂蛋白血症和吸烟;脑小血管病的主要危险因素为年龄、高血压、糖尿病和高胆固醇血症;②颈动脉粥样硬化与脑小血管病比较,年龄、高血压在脑小血管病中的作用更为突出,而高胆固醇血症与颈动脉粥样硬化的关系更为密切;高低密度脂蛋白血症和吸烟是颈动脉粥样硬化的独立危险因素,而非脑小血管病的危险因素。③年龄和高血压在脑白质疏松中的作用更突出,而高胆固醇血症与腔隙性脑梗死的关系更为密切。④腔隙性脑梗死组颈动脉粥样硬化发生率高于脑白质疏松组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论①脑小血管病与颈动脉粥样硬化的危险因素虽然有很大程度重叠,却不完全相同;腔隙性脑梗死与脑白质疏松的危险因素也不尽相同;②脑小血管病与颈动脉粥样硬化的发生有一定程度相关,其中颈动脉粥样硬化与腔隙性脑梗死的关系较脑白质疏松更为密切,但颈动脉粥样硬化并非脑小血管病的独立危险因素。

    Abstract:

    Aim To compare the risk factors of small vessel disease(SVD) or its subtypes(lacunar infarction and leukoaraiosis) and carotid atherosclerosis(CAS),deduce the effect of CAS on SVD and provide data for early prevention and cure. Methods Data of age,hypertension,diabetes mellitus,smoking,blood fat,alcohol,fibrinogen(FIB),abdomen circumference and body mass index(BMI) were analysed in the patients with SVD(n=366),CAS(n=266) and controls.Patients with SVD were subdivided into lacunar infarction(LI) and leukoaraiosis(LA). Results A total of 506 patients met the inclusion criteria,among which,174 were lacunar cerebral infarction,192 were leukoaraiosis and 140 were normal.Among the 391 patients who were examined by color Duplex ultrasound,266 were found carotid atherosclerosis.①Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that age,hypertension,diabetes mellitus,hypercholesterinemia,high low density lipoprotein(LDL) and smoking were more frequent in CAS group compared with the controls(P<0.05).In SVD group,hypertension,diabetes mellitus,hypercholesterinemia were more important.②Age(OR=1.07,95%CI 0.56~1.96,P<0.001),Hypertension(OR=2.28,95% CI 1.88~3.72,P<0.001) were more common in SVD than CAS;but hypercholesterinemia(OR=0.53,95% CI 0.23 ~ 1.22,P<0.001) was more important in CAS,high LDL and smoking were the risk factors of CAS but not SVD.③Age,hypertension were more important in LA than LI;on the contrary,hypercholesterinemia was more common in LI.④The pearson coefficient between SVD and CAS was 0.360,the incidence rate of CAS in LI was more frequent than LA. Conclusion ①There are some differences in risk factor profile between SVD and CAS,the same to LI and LA.②The incidence of CAS is related to SVD to some extent,the relationship of CAS with LI is closer than LA.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张东平,张波,胡长林.脑小血管病及其亚型与颈动脉粥样硬化的相关性[J].中国动脉硬化杂志,2008,16(6):487~491.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2007-10-24
  • 最后修改日期:2008-05-15
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: